<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Reckless Predictions</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2008/01/01/more-reckless-predictions-2/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 23:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Roach</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2008/01/01/more-reckless-predictions-2/#comment-8414</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2008/01/01/more-reckless-predictions-2/#comment-8414</guid>
					<description>Predictions aren't very useful.  If they're wrong, they should really shame future predictions and cause serious self-reflection about what went wrong.  I for instance predicted the surge would be a disaster.  It's been surprisingly effective.  I too must avoid predictions, and atone for wrong ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Predictions aren&#8217;t very useful.  If they&#8217;re wrong, they should really shame future predictions and cause serious self-reflection about what went wrong.  I for instance predicted the surge would be a disaster.  It&#8217;s been surprisingly effective.  I too must avoid predictions, and atone for wrong ones.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brendancalling</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2008/01/01/more-reckless-predictions-2/#comment-8411</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2008/01/01/more-reckless-predictions-2/#comment-8411</guid>
					<description>Hi, new to this blog, but here on recommendations from Belgravia Dispatch and a link at Balloon Juice.

I totally agree with your analysis regarding Edwards and Huckabee in Iowa (and also your ron paul posts).

I will be a regular reader from now on, I really enjoy the work here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, new to this blog, but here on recommendations from Belgravia Dispatch and a link at Balloon Juice.</p>
<p>I totally agree with your analysis regarding Edwards and Huckabee in Iowa (and also your ron paul posts).</p>
<p>I will be a regular reader from now on, I really enjoy the work here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tcowan</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2008/01/01/more-reckless-predictions-2/#comment-8410</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2008/01/01/more-reckless-predictions-2/#comment-8410</guid>
					<description>Daniel, I tend to agree with your predictions.  This may give your pause to rethink your positions a bit, as I have been so wrong, so often.  I believe Edwards will win, barely.  I think Obama will be so close, that it will be perceived a tie, probably depriving Edwards of the boost he has to have out of Iowa.  Huckabee may still win Iowa, though he has already started to fade a bit.  Even if he wins, I do not see his way forward from there (For that matter, I don't see the way forward for ANY of them.)  BTW, I enjoyed your latest article iin "Chronicles."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, I tend to agree with your predictions.  This may give your pause to rethink your positions a bit, as I have been so wrong, so often.  I believe Edwards will win, barely.  I think Obama will be so close, that it will be perceived a tie, probably depriving Edwards of the boost he has to have out of Iowa.  Huckabee may still win Iowa, though he has already started to fade a bit.  Even if he wins, I do not see his way forward from there (For that matter, I don&#8217;t see the way forward for ANY of them.)  BTW, I enjoyed your latest article iin &#8220;Chronicles.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
