<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phoenix Tears Have Healing Powers&#8230;Or Were Those Chuck Norris&#8217; Tears?</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Leonard</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/#comment-8275</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/#comment-8275</guid>
					<description>I read the phoenix bit as Huck's way to criticize and distance himself from Bush without too overtly criticizing and distancing himself from Bush.  Don't you think so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the phoenix bit as Huck&#8217;s way to criticize and distance himself from Bush without too overtly criticizing and distancing himself from Bush.  Don&#8217;t you think so?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: joe@2parse</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/#comment-8272</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/#comment-8272</guid>
					<description>Nice skewering of Huckabee.  submitted the story to reddit - hope that gets the entry some deserved traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice skewering of Huckabee.  submitted the story to reddit - hope that gets the entry some deserved traffic.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Larison</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/#comment-8271</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/#comment-8271</guid>
					<description>Thanks.  The coincidence of Huckabee using both the phoenix image and the Norris endorsement was just too good to pass up.  You may be right.  I was overinterpreting that line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  The coincidence of Huckabee using both the phoenix image and the Norris endorsement was just too good to pass up.  You may be right.  I was overinterpreting that line.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: J Mann</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/#comment-8270</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/12/06/phoenix-tears-have-healing-powersor-were-those-chuck-norris-tears/#comment-8270</guid>
					<description>Very funny post, and I've appreciated your cynical take on all of the candidates.  
 
I thought the Sweden comment was basically fair, though.  Sweden is well-chosen because Huckabee is trying his hardest *not* to say that he wants to treat Saudi Arabia badly.  Taking him at his word, he would like to treat Saudi Arabia as if it were a small country, far away, in which we might have some moral and economic interests but no strong national interests one way or the other, as opposed to treating them as a vital guarantor of our energy supply.
 
Of course, for real courage, I would like to see Huckabee say that he would like to treat *Israel* the way he would treat Sweden . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny post, and I&#8217;ve appreciated your cynical take on all of the candidates.  </p>
<p>I thought the Sweden comment was basically fair, though.  Sweden is well-chosen because Huckabee is trying his hardest *not* to say that he wants to treat Saudi Arabia badly.  Taking him at his word, he would like to treat Saudi Arabia as if it were a small country, far away, in which we might have some moral and economic interests but no strong national interests one way or the other, as opposed to treating them as a vital guarantor of our energy supply.</p>
<p>Of course, for real courage, I would like to see Huckabee say that he would like to treat *Israel* the way he would treat Sweden . . .
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
