<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worse Impulses</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2007/10/23/worse-impulses/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Zarathustra</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/10/23/worse-impulses/#comment-7925</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/10/23/worse-impulses/#comment-7925</guid>
					<description>As if it even needed to be said, their action simply made the situation about ten times worse than it was; the front page this evening had little content on it that wasn't in some way about the decision, for or against. If their goal truly was to reduce the RP discussion on the board then they failed rather miserably, and predictably.

And of course, I would have no problem with RS taking harsh action against those Paul supporters who have no obvious intention of engaging in dialog if RS would just treat Paul backers as equals who deserve at least a modicum of respect instead of the non-stop ridicule that they've received since the beginning of the primary campaign. 

NB: Having moderators who proudly advertise their fetish for banning people for the slightest (perceived) indiscretion isn't helping RS any, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if it even needed to be said, their action simply made the situation about ten times worse than it was; the front page this evening had little content on it that wasn&#8217;t in some way about the decision, for or against. If their goal truly was to reduce the RP discussion on the board then they failed rather miserably, and predictably.</p>
<p>And of course, I would have no problem with RS taking harsh action against those Paul supporters who have no obvious intention of engaging in dialog if RS would just treat Paul backers as equals who deserve at least a modicum of respect instead of the non-stop ridicule that they&#8217;ve received since the beginning of the primary campaign. </p>
<p>NB: Having moderators who proudly advertise their fetish for banning people for the slightest (perceived) indiscretion isn&#8217;t helping RS any, either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
