<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assumptions</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2007/09/26/assumptions/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Pithlord</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/09/26/assumptions/#comment-7758</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/09/26/assumptions/#comment-7758</guid>
					<description>You make an important point about the "brain drain": that is a far bigger problem for the least developed countries than whatever advantages those countries would get from sending surplus labour to Europe or America. From talking to Ethiopians about this, I think there is great ambivalence. On the one hand, individually, people usually want to get out and give their children a better life. On the other hand, they are also proud of their civilization (hard as that might be for Willkinson to imagine) and want their country to develop. No one there really imagines that mass migration is an overall solution -- Wilkinson's views would be received politely but skeptically -- and everyone knows immigration means fewer doctors and engineers, along with fewer people who might have the wherewithall to oppose the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make an important point about the &#8220;brain drain&#8221;: that is a far bigger problem for the least developed countries than whatever advantages those countries would get from sending surplus labour to Europe or America. From talking to Ethiopians about this, I think there is great ambivalence. On the one hand, individually, people usually want to get out and give their children a better life. On the other hand, they are also proud of their civilization (hard as that might be for Willkinson to imagine) and want their country to develop. No one there really imagines that mass migration is an overall solution &#8212; Wilkinson&#8217;s views would be received politely but skeptically &#8212; and everyone knows immigration means fewer doctors and engineers, along with fewer people who might have the wherewithall to oppose the government.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Maximos</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/09/26/assumptions/#comment-7726</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/09/26/assumptions/#comment-7726</guid>
					<description>That's just the thing, Chris, the libertarians don't have an argument for so thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just the thing, Chris, the libertarians don&#8217;t have an argument for so thinking.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: chrisgbr</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/09/26/assumptions/#comment-7723</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/09/26/assumptions/#comment-7723</guid>
					<description>Can someone please explain to me why it is "abhorrent" to think that we have greater responsibility for those that depend on and interact with us, than we do to those who do not? 

Surely if no relationships are to merit special value, then none will have any at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please explain to me why it is &#8220;abhorrent&#8221; to think that we have greater responsibility for those that depend on and interact with us, than we do to those who do not? </p>
<p>Surely if no relationships are to merit special value, then none will have any at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
