<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twilightenment</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2007/05/28/twilightenment/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Solent</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/05/28/twilightenment/#comment-6767</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 23:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/05/28/twilightenment/#comment-6767</guid>
					<description>There are important ways in which postmodernity is best understood as an extension of Enlightenment modernity rather than a rejection--undercutting the thrust of B.'s point--but there are certainly borad and readily observable parallels between C-E thought and postmodernism regarding the rejection of the autonomous/unitary/universal self.

As for suspicion of reason, I don't know who exactly Bottum refers to here, but C-E hero Hamann's views on language and reason also have interesting parallels in postmodern thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are important ways in which postmodernity is best understood as an extension of Enlightenment modernity rather than a rejection&#8211;undercutting the thrust of B.&#8217;s point&#8211;but there are certainly borad and readily observable parallels between C-E thought and postmodernism regarding the rejection of the autonomous/unitary/universal self.</p>
<p>As for suspicion of reason, I don&#8217;t know who exactly Bottum refers to here, but C-E hero Hamann&#8217;s views on language and reason also have interesting parallels in postmodern thought.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
