Comments on: Who Will Write Dangerous Nationalists? http://larison.org/2007/05/21/who-will-write-dangerous-nationalists/ n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:50:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Christopher B. Hayes http://larison.org/2007/05/21/who-will-write-dangerous-nationalists/#comment-6669 Tue, 22 May 2007 13:00:56 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/21/who-will-write-dangerous-nationalists/#comment-6669 Several have tried to claim the title <i> Dangerous Nationalists, </i> but to avoid confusion are going to just stick with the titles "The biography of Ann Coulter", "The biography of Sean Hannity" etc... Several have tried to claim the title Dangerous Nationalists, but to avoid confusion are going to just stick with the titles “The biography of Ann Coulter”, “The biography of Sean Hannity” etc…

]]> by: Matt Zeitlin http://larison.org/2007/05/21/who-will-write-dangerous-nationalists/#comment-6667 Tue, 22 May 2007 05:10:46 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/21/who-will-write-dangerous-nationalists/#comment-6667 Oh wow, that comment was total crap, upon rereading it looks like I managed to express zero clear thoughts. Let's try that again. Now, I’ll understand if you find my starstuckedness and obsequiousness annoying, but I feel like I’m obligated to link to this, http://whippersnapper.blogspot.com/2007/05/two-wrongs-dont-make-right-comparitive.html, It is my own take on the Coedvilla article, where I compare the Kagan view of american history to the Zinnesque leftist, marxian view and find shocking, well not that shocking considering the roots of many neocons, similarities. I am also suprised that a book whose mission it is to support the hegemonic, interventionist neocon agenda and try to place it into the oldest traditions of American history was so panned by a someone who is "wildly, intensely hawkish and hegemonist". The book must have really been crap; I guess we’d expect nothing less from Kagan Oh wow, that comment was total crap, upon rereading it looks like I managed to express zero clear thoughts. Let’s try that again.

Now, I’ll understand if you find my starstuckedness and obsequiousness annoying, but I feel like I’m obligated to link to this, http://whippersnapper.blogspot.com/2007/05/two-wrongs-dont-make-right-comparitive.html, It is my own take on the Coedvilla article, where I compare the Kagan view of american history to the Zinnesque leftist, marxian view and find shocking, well not that shocking considering the roots of many neocons, similarities.

I am also suprised that a book whose mission it is to support the hegemonic, interventionist neocon agenda and try to place it into the oldest traditions of American history was so panned by a someone who is “wildly, intensely hawkish and hegemonist”. The book must have really been crap; I guess we’d expect nothing less from Kagan

]]> by: Matt Zeitlin http://larison.org/2007/05/21/who-will-write-dangerous-nationalists/#comment-6665 Tue, 22 May 2007 05:05:32 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/21/who-will-write-dangerous-nationalists/#comment-6665 Now, I'll understand if you findmy starstuckedness and obsequois annoying, but I feel like I'm obligated to link to this, http://whippersnapper.blogspot.com/2007/05/two-wrongs-dont-make-right-comparitive.html, my own take on the Coedvilla article I am also suprised that a book whose mission is to support the hegemonic, interventionist neocon agenda and place into the oldest traditions of American history. The book must have really been crap, we'd expect nothing less from Kagan Now, I’ll understand if you findmy starstuckedness and obsequois annoying, but I feel like I’m obligated to link to this, http://whippersnapper.blogspot.com/2007/05/two-wrongs-dont-make-right-comparitive.html,
my own take on the Coedvilla article I am also suprised that a book whose mission is to support the hegemonic, interventionist neocon agenda and place into the oldest traditions of American history. The book must have really been crap, we’d expect nothing less from Kagan

]]>