<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cutting The Knot</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2007/05/20/cutting-the-knot/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 07:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: alkali</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/05/20/cutting-the-knot/#comment-6659</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/05/20/cutting-the-knot/#comment-6659</guid>
					<description>&lt;I&gt; [The antebellum South] represented a social and political order that was, if anything, attempting to retain some combination of aristocratic and agrarian republican structures out of a profound respect for past precedents and classical models (which is, ironically, one of the reasons why Hanson, a classicist, hates the Old South so much) ...&lt;/I&gt;

While I don't disagree with the post's ultimate point, this particular bit really calls for a spoonful of vulgar Marxism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><I> [The antebellum South] represented a social and political order that was, if anything, attempting to retain some combination of aristocratic and agrarian republican structures out of a profound respect for past precedents and classical models (which is, ironically, one of the reasons why Hanson, a classicist, hates the Old South so much) &#8230;</I></p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t disagree with the post&#8217;s ultimate point, this particular bit really calls for a spoonful of vulgar Marxism.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
