Comments on: It Won’t Restore The Stewarts To The Throne, But It’ll Do For Now http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/ n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:17:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Mike Burgess http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6450 Fri, 04 May 2007 23:34:36 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6450 Well here's a kick in the head: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070504/wl_nm/britain_elections_dc_21 SNP takes majority. Who'd a thunk? Well here’s a kick in the head:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070504/wl_nm/britain_elections_dc_21

SNP takes majority. Who’d a thunk?

]]> by: gabriel http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6448 Fri, 04 May 2007 16:05:58 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6448 I stand corrected. I stand corrected.

]]> by: Cascadian http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6434 Thu, 03 May 2007 21:45:41 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6434 I used to think my favorite thing about this blog was how frequently you quote K-L (I mean, where else can I find <i>Black Banners</i> cited online?). But your endorsement of Laphroaig is running that a solid second. Slàinte to you over my copy of <i>Moscow 1979</i>! I used to think my favorite thing about this blog was how frequently you quote K-L (I mean, where else can I find Black Banners cited online?). But your endorsement of Laphroaig is running that a solid second. Slàinte to you over my copy of Moscow 1979!

]]> by: Grumpy Old Man http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6418 Thu, 03 May 2007 11:21:19 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6418 An independent Scotland will probably start out socialist, but the whiskey will still be good for a while. An independent Scotland will probably start out socialist, but the whiskey will still be good for a while.

]]> by: A.K.B. Cusack http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6417 Thu, 03 May 2007 11:05:42 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6417 Try Glenmorangie. Try Glenmorangie.

]]> by: Daniel Larison http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6414 Thu, 03 May 2007 02:06:27 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6414 Not a bit of it. Stewart is the original spelling of the family name when they earlier ruled in Scotland. Some examples of the continued usage of the old spelling: http://members.aol.com/Windhover/stuart.html http://www.amazon.com/James-I-Stewart-Dynasty-Scotland/dp/1862321051 http://www.amazon.com/James-IV-Stewart-Dynasty-Scotland/dp/1862320063 <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/James-Personal-1528-42-Stewart-Scotland/dp/1862320152/ref=sr_1_3/203-3663930-2891144?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1178157828&sr=1-3" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/James-Personal-1528-42-Stewart-Scotland/dp/1862320152/ref=sr_1_3/203-3663930-2891144?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1178157828&sr=1-3</a> <a href="http://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/usbiography/monarchs/houseofstewart.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/usbiography/monarchs/houseofstewart.html</a> <a href="http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lennich/jacobite.htm" rel="nofollow">http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lennich/jacobite.htm</a> Now, I'm not insisting that people <em>only </em>use the old spelling, since the other spelling has been widely and frequently used as well, but I will insist that the more venerable spelling of the name be accepted at the same time. Not a bit of it. Stewart is the original spelling of the family name when they earlier ruled in Scotland. Some examples of the continued usage of the old spelling:

http://members.aol.com/Windhover/stuart.html
http://www.amazon.com/James-I-Stewart-Dynasty-Scotland/dp/1862321051
http://www.amazon.com/James-IV-Stewart-Dynasty-Scotland/dp/1862320063
http://www.amazon.co.uk/James-Personal-1528-42-Stewart-Scotland/dp/1862320152/ref=sr_1_3/203-3663930-2891144?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1178157828&sr=1-3

http://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/usbiography/monarchs/houseofstewart.html

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lennich/jacobite.htm

Now, I’m not insisting that people only use the old spelling, since the other spelling has been widely and frequently used as well, but I will insist that the more venerable spelling of the name be accepted at the same time.

]]> by: gabriel http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6413 Thu, 03 May 2007 01:49:52 +0000 http://larison.org/2007/05/02/it-wont-restore-the-stewarts-to-the-throne-but-itll-do-for-now/#comment-6413 Stuarts, rather. We'll forgive you this once on account of your being American. I'm a Laguvalin man myself. Stuarts, rather. We’ll forgive you this once on account of your being American.

I’m a Laguvalin man myself.

]]>