<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He Still Isn&#8217;t Conservative</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2007/03/03/he-still-isnt-conservative/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sephiroth</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/03/03/he-still-isnt-conservative/#comment-5742</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/03/03/he-still-isnt-conservative/#comment-5742</guid>
					<description>Well, with the exception of Hewitt, they're all opposed to the amnesty scam the Decider-in-Chief attempted to foist on us. I actually give Morissey and Malkin a sizable amount of credit for breaking with their neo-ish allies on this; any deviation from the globo-con "Invade and Invite the World" party line is praiseworthy in these times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, with the exception of Hewitt, they&#8217;re all opposed to the amnesty scam the Decider-in-Chief attempted to foist on us. I actually give Morissey and Malkin a sizable amount of credit for breaking with their neo-ish allies on this; any deviation from the globo-con &#8220;Invade and Invite the World&#8221; party line is praiseworthy in these times.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2007/03/03/he-still-isnt-conservative/#comment-5740</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2007/03/03/he-still-isnt-conservative/#comment-5740</guid>
					<description>Who's "conservative" these days, except thee and me? (Even I wonder about me, sometimes.)

Larison, Dreher, Hewitt, Ed Morissey, Malkin, George Will, Buchanan, etcetera and so forth. There's a common thread there somewhere, but I must have forgotten what it was.

Meanwhile:

Mitt's just another pretty face/empty suit, whose positions are guided by market research. McCain's trying to back his way into the tent, but he's pretty much soaked the outside flap and nobody's fooled. Rudy's only sidling up to the tent a bit, but &lt;i&gt;faute de mieux&lt;/i&gt; he's not in full pander mode and is still prettty much himself, whether you like sequined ball gowns or not. In terms of their presence in the race so far, the others are pretty much in Kucinich territory; too bad, because some have good things to say. Email me if one of them breaks out of the pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s &#8220;conservative&#8221; these days, except thee and me? (Even I wonder about me, sometimes.)</p>
<p>Larison, Dreher, Hewitt, Ed Morissey, Malkin, George Will, Buchanan, etcetera and so forth. There&#8217;s a common thread there somewhere, but I must have forgotten what it was.</p>
<p>Meanwhile:</p>
<p>Mitt&#8217;s just another pretty face/empty suit, whose positions are guided by market research. McCain&#8217;s trying to back his way into the tent, but he&#8217;s pretty much soaked the outside flap and nobody&#8217;s fooled. Rudy&#8217;s only sidling up to the tent a bit, but <i>faute de mieux</i> he&#8217;s not in full pander mode and is still prettty much himself, whether you like sequined ball gowns or not. In terms of their presence in the race so far, the others are pretty much in Kucinich territory; too bad, because some have good things to say. Email me if one of them breaks out of the pack.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
