But he wasn’t. He may regard them with contempt (my personal impression is that JK regards most of the human race with contempt); he may despise them; he may think they’re dumb crackers; but T-H-A-T-’-S N-O-T W-H-A-T H-E S-A-I-D.
What he said was: “You know, education, if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.”
Who is stuck in Iraq? Not the common soldier, who just does a tour of duty, as Kerry himself knows from (sorry to bring it up) experience. Who’s stuck in Iraq? George W. Bush is stuck in Iraq. That was the point of Kerry’s joke. Which he botched. No fair-minded person, watching Kerry deliver those lines, could think otherwise. ~John Derbyshire
If the Derb is right, and I think he is, what can it say for all of the legions of Republican loyalists and pundits that the first thing that leaped to their minds was, “This is an insult to our troops!” Granted, it was one of the worse, “Bush is a moron” jokes of our time, but doesn’t the reaction to this strike anyone as being as strained and incredible as the Democratic reaction to the alleged miscegenation references in the anti-Ford ad in Tennessee? People hung up on race and racism see references to race even when they aren’t there, as they did in that ad (the ad was sleazy and asinine, not racist); people who assume that Kerry was talking about military personnel…well, perhaps their respect for the soldiers isn’t quite what it should be if they automatically assume that references to poor education have something to do with soldiers. At the very least, it seems clear that everyone went into ideological overdrive the minute someone possibly said something questionable about “the troops”–rather than pay attention to what was said and what the clown intended to say, they picked up the worn-down refrain, “That lousy liberal insulted the troops!” because they know they have nothing else to say. That said, would someone just make John Kerry go far, far away where he cannot bother anyone? Perhaps Mars? (But, then, what has Mars ever done to us that it should be punished in this way?)
So Kerry is a buffoon (we already knew that) and the worst comedian on earth (we assumed as much), but how desperate and bereft of any positive appeal do these people have to be that they are literally thanking God for delivering them something, anything, that can distract voters from the war and the failures of this majority and this administration? How worthless must the argument for their retaining a majority be that they are so thrilled to finally have some political oxygen for their worn-out cliches about how they are the party of national defense and national security? They cannot thrive on the merits of their own record, which is an appalling record, so they must have a hate-figure to rally against, and no one serves this role better than the ridiculous, the preposterous, the unbelievably obnoxious John Kerry. People who fall for this and re-elect the GOP deserve whatever they get.
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 1st, 2006 at 8:54 am
gabriel
Derb is most definitely wrong here. By “you can do well” Kerry wasn’t referring to the idea that “you’ll be good at what you do” but that “you’ll be a success in the eyes of the world”. Who uses the term “do well” in this context but to mean worldly success? Contrast that with the other option “you get stuck in Iraq”, and it’s extremely clear that he’s referring to the troops.
This is a classic case where a public figure said what he actually thought for a moment, and has been caught out on it.
November 1st, 2006 at 8:59 am
gabriel
And one other thing- apparently much of his partisan audience wasn’t “fair-minded” either- all the news reports suggest that his line was met by gasps as well as laughter. And I’d suggest that a significant amount of the crowd in Pasadena was willing to laugh at the poor yokel troops.
November 1st, 2006 at 9:32 am
Grumpy Old Man
LaShawn Barber thinks it was a flub, and is mystified why the man didn’t apologize. Good question.
Freudian slip, tin ear, or both, it sure doesn’t inspire confidence.
November 1st, 2006 at 9:51 am
gabriel
Yeah, I’ve read Lashawn Barber’s post, and I don’t find it persuasive at all. If the Kerry camp was only claiming that he flubbed the last line, it might be remotely plausible. However, they claim he meant to put the entire previous sentence in the negative. Nor did he mean to say “you can do well” either. Why we should accept this transparent reinterpretation rather than the plain meaning of Kerry’s words is a mystery to me.
Moreover, Kerry’s point as actually delivered makes more sense- work hard so you have opportunities and you don’t have to join the yokels in Iraq. How much sense does it make to be saying “Work hard so you don’t become President of the United States and foolishly get the country stuck in an unwinnable war?”
And, they haven’t released his prepared speech. Why? Because either the line was in there more or less as delivered, or (far more likely) Kerry just spoke extemporaneously.
November 1st, 2006 at 12:02 pm
Daniel Larison
John Hood at The Corner wrote earlier today:
I don’t know if this places me into Derb’s posse or not, but I have to admit that I don’t think John Kerry meant to suggest that if you are uneducated, you end up as a soldier stuck in Iraq. His folks have released what they claim is the original prepared text, and it shows that Kerry was planning to make fun of Bush’s education. It came out wrong. That’s it (assuming you don’t think the prepared text was fabricated after the fact).
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWY1YzAyY2VjZjZhOGQ2ZWQ3YzVhYThjZDMxODgxODk=
I understand why people took what he said badly. I can understand why the initial reaction was harsh, when people thought he said something that he did not mean to say. He should have apologised for giving any impression that he was referring to soldiers, and made it clear what he meant. That’s all fine and understandable, and I agree with people who say that he should have apologised. But I will rapidly lose patience with people who continue to chant that he was insulting the soldiers. Not because I care whether John Kerry lives or dies (I don’t), but because it is now clearly and manifestly untrue that this is what he was trying to do.
November 1st, 2006 at 12:51 pm
gabriel
Yesterday, the Kerry camp claimed that he had meant to say:
“I can’t overstress the importance of a great education. Do you know where you end up if you don’t study, if you aren’t smart, if you’re intellectually lazy? You end up getting us stuck in a war in Iraq.” Today, he claims he missed the punch line “Just ask President Bush.”
I’m sorry, but I don’t find it creditable. I do find meaning of the original speech fairly straightforward. Plain meaning, context and reason all point towards the view that Kerry was maligning the soldiers.
Now, implying that a lack of education pushes people into the Army isn’t the worst thing in the world- but it is what he said and meant. It’s not an absurd statement either- most people would probably think he’s right- though they’d think it demeaning to point it out (I understand that on the facts, soldiers are not undereducated).