<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War? What War?; What&#8217;s Their Problem, Anyway?; &#8220;They All Look The Same To Me&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2006/09/28/war-what-war-whats-their-problem-anyway-they-all-look-the-same-to-me/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jlbarnard</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2006/09/28/war-what-war-whats-their-problem-anyway-they-all-look-the-same-to-me/#comment-4697</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2006/09/28/war-what-war-whats-their-problem-anyway-they-all-look-the-same-to-me/#comment-4697</guid>
					<description>I suppose Lott's stupidity comments on itself. 

I wish I had the time to read Bob Woodward's new book, but I really don't, especially since the content would only confirm what I already know, and massage my already deeply held opinions of the current administration. That being said, it's surely worth a quick look at Michiko Kakutani's review. Here's the highlight (what Andrew Sullivan would call the "money quote"):

"President Bush emerges as a passive, impatient, sophomoric and intellectually incurious leader, presiding over a grossly dysfunctional war cabinet and given to an almost religious certainty that makes him disinclined to rethink or re-evaluate decisions he has made about the war."

And here's some supporting evidence:

"Iraq administrator Jay Garner’s reluctance to tell the president about the mistakes he saw the Pentagon making in Iraq, Mr. Woodward writes: “It was only one example of a visitor to the Oval Office not telling the president the whole story or the truth. Likewise, in these moments where Bush had someone from the field there in the chair beside him, he did not press, did not try to open the door himself and ask what the visitor had seen and thought. The whole atmosphere too often resembled a royal court, with Cheney and Rice in attendance, some upbeat stories, exaggerated good news and a good time had by all.” Were the war in Iraq not a real war that has resulted in more than 2,700 American military casualties and more than 56,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, the picture of the Bush administration that emerges from this book might resemble a farce. It’s like something out of “The Daily Show” or a “Saturday Night Live” sketch, with Freudian Bush family dramas and high-school-like rivalries between cabinet members who refuse to look at one another at meetings being played out on the world stage.

There’s the president, who once said, “I don’t have the foggiest idea about what I think about international, foreign policy,” deciding that he’s going to remake the Middle East and alter the course of American foreign policy. There’s his father, former President George Herbert Walker Bush (who went to war against the same country a decade ago), worrying about the wisdom of another war but reluctant to offer his opinions to his son because he believes in the principle of “let him be himself.” There’s the president’s national security adviser whining to him that the defense secretary won’t return her phone calls. And there’s the president and Karl Rove, his chief political adviser, trading fart jokes."

As Vonnegut might say: "Welcome to the monkey house."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose Lott&#8217;s stupidity comments on itself. </p>
<p>I wish I had the time to read Bob Woodward&#8217;s new book, but I really don&#8217;t, especially since the content would only confirm what I already know, and massage my already deeply held opinions of the current administration. That being said, it&#8217;s surely worth a quick look at Michiko Kakutani&#8217;s review. Here&#8217;s the highlight (what Andrew Sullivan would call the &#8220;money quote&#8221;):</p>
<p>&#8220;President Bush emerges as a passive, impatient, sophomoric and intellectually incurious leader, presiding over a grossly dysfunctional war cabinet and given to an almost religious certainty that makes him disinclined to rethink or re-evaluate decisions he has made about the war.&#8221;</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s some supporting evidence:</p>
<p>&#8220;Iraq administrator Jay Garner’s reluctance to tell the president about the mistakes he saw the Pentagon making in Iraq, Mr. Woodward writes: “It was only one example of a visitor to the Oval Office not telling the president the whole story or the truth. Likewise, in these moments where Bush had someone from the field there in the chair beside him, he did not press, did not try to open the door himself and ask what the visitor had seen and thought. The whole atmosphere too often resembled a royal court, with Cheney and Rice in attendance, some upbeat stories, exaggerated good news and a good time had by all.” Were the war in Iraq not a real war that has resulted in more than 2,700 American military casualties and more than 56,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, the picture of the Bush administration that emerges from this book might resemble a farce. It’s like something out of “The Daily Show” or a “Saturday Night Live” sketch, with Freudian Bush family dramas and high-school-like rivalries between cabinet members who refuse to look at one another at meetings being played out on the world stage.</p>
<p>There’s the president, who once said, “I don’t have the foggiest idea about what I think about international, foreign policy,” deciding that he’s going to remake the Middle East and alter the course of American foreign policy. There’s his father, former President George Herbert Walker Bush (who went to war against the same country a decade ago), worrying about the wisdom of another war but reluctant to offer his opinions to his son because he believes in the principle of “let him be himself.” There’s the president’s national security adviser whining to him that the defense secretary won’t return her phone calls. And there’s the president and Karl Rove, his chief political adviser, trading fart jokes.&#8221;</p>
<p>As Vonnegut might say: &#8220;Welcome to the monkey house.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
